Question 1: What kinds of fast food have you tried? [Why/Why not?]

Sample Answer: Oh, I've tried quite a few! I mean, growing up, pizza was a staple, especially Domino's – cheesy, greasy, the whole shebang. I used to love it, but now I try to avoid it because it's so heavy. I've also had my fair share of burgers – McDonald's, Burger King, even some local places. They're convenient, you know? Perfect for a quick lunch between classes or if I'm really short on time. I actually tried a really interesting gourmet burger place recently, it was much better quality than the usual fast food chains. Then there's fried chicken – KFC mostly, guilty pleasure! I don't have it often, partly because I find it a bit too much, and also I’m trying to eat healthier. I haven't tried too many other kinds, honestly. Things like tacos or sushi are usually better made at proper restaurants, in my opinion, so I tend to stick to those for those types of food.

Question 2: Do you ever use a microwave to cook food quickly? [Why/Why not?]

Sample Answer: Yes, I use a microwave quite often, especially when I’m in a hurry. It’s great for reheating leftovers or making quick meals. It saves a lot of time, and I don’t need to wash many dishes. However, I still prefer cooking fresh food when I have more time.

Question 3: How popular are fast food restaurants where you live? [Why/Why not?]

Sample Answer: Oh, they're incredibly popular where I live, especially amongst students and young professionals like myself. There are loads of them – you can find a McDonald's or a KFC on practically every main street. I think it's mainly down to convenience; they're quick, cheap, and readily available, perfect for a busy lifestyle. Plus, they often have deals and promotions, which makes them even more appealing, especially when you're on a budget. There are some healthier options popping up, but the classic burger and fries places still reign supreme. It's definitely a mixed bag; you see people grabbing a quick lunch there, but also families dining in, so it's clearly catering to a broad range of people.

Question 4: When would you go to a fast-food restaurant? [Why/Why not?]

Sample Answer: I usually go to fast-food restaurants when I’m too busy to cook or when I’m out with friends. It’s convenient and quick, especially if I’m in a rush. Sometimes I just crave something like fried chicken or a burger. However, I try not to go too often because it’s not the healthiest choice.

Question 1: Describe some technology (an app, phone, software program) that you decided to stop using.

Sample Answer: Okay, so there's this productivity app I used to be really into, called Forest. It's supposed to help you focus by planting a virtual tree that grows while you work, and if you leave the app before your timer is up, the tree dies. Sounds great in theory, right? And for a while, it actually worked! I was really motivated by the little virtual forest I was building. But then it just… got annoying. I found myself constantly worried about my tree dying, even when I needed to quickly check something else or take a proper break. It felt more like a source of stress than a productivity tool. Plus, I started to feel guilty if I *had* to leave the app for something important, like an urgent phone call or a real-life human interaction. So, I eventually just deleted it. It was a bit sad to see my little virtual trees wither away, but in the end, it felt liberating to stop being controlled by this virtual plant-based system. I now prefer to use a simpler timer, something less… judgemental.

Question 1: What kinds of computer games do people play in your country?

Sample Answer: Well, it's a pretty broad spectrum, actually. You've got your casual gamers playing things like Candy Crush or mobile puzzle games – those are incredibly popular, especially amongst older people and younger kids. Then you have the more dedicated gamers who are really into the big titles, like PUBG or Call of Duty – the online multiplayer shooters are hugely popular, especially amongst young men. There's also a growing interest in strategy games like League of Legends and Dota 2, those are really competitive and people spend a lot of time playing them. And of course, you can't forget about the single-player RPGs and adventure games – those still have a strong following, although maybe a slightly older demographic. So yeah, it's a pretty diverse range, depending on the person and how much time they want to dedicate to gaming.

Question 2: Why do people enjoy playing computer games?

Sample Answer: Well, I think there are loads of reasons, really. For some, it's the escapism – you can be anyone, anywhere, doing anything you want, which is a massive appeal, especially after a stressful day at work or uni. Then there's the social aspect; a lot of games are multiplayer, so you connect with friends, build teamwork skills, and even make new friends online. Plus, some games are just really cleverly designed – the puzzles, the challenges, the storylines can be incredibly engaging and rewarding. I guess it's also a way to relax and unwind for many people; it can be really therapeutic to just zone out and focus on something else for a while. And finally, for some it's a bit of friendly competition – the thrill of winning, beating your high score, or outsmarting other players is definitely a big draw for a lot of gamers.

Question 3: Do you think that all computer games should have a minimum age for players?

Sample Answer: Hmm, that's a tricky one. On the one hand, I can see why some people would think so. There's definitely a lot of content in some games that's not suitable for younger kids – violence, inappropriate language, that kind of thing. You know, protecting children is really important. But on the other hand, it's not always clear-cut what age is appropriate. Some games are perfectly fine for younger kids, even if they look complex, and imposing a minimum age might unfairly restrict access to things that are actually beneficial, like puzzle games that develop problem-solving skills. I think maybe a better approach would be to have really clear and detailed age ratings, with parents taking responsibility for choosing suitable games for their children, rather than a blanket minimum age for all games. It's more about responsible use, I think.

Question 4: In what ways can technology in the classroom be helpful?

Sample Answer: Well, I think technology can be really helpful in a few key ways. Firstly, it can make learning much more engaging. Instead of just reading from a textbook, you can watch videos, play interactive games, or even use virtual reality to explore historical sites or scientific processes – that makes things way more interesting and easier to remember. Secondly, it opens up a world of resources. Students can access information from anywhere, anytime, through online libraries and educational websites. This is especially helpful for independent learning and research. And finally, I think technology can personalize the learning experience. Adaptive learning platforms can adjust to a student's pace and learning style, focusing on areas where they need more help and moving quicker through things they've already mastered. So, it's not just about replacing traditional methods, it's about enhancing them and making education more effective for everyone.

Question 5: Do you agree that students are often better at using technology than their teachers?

Sample Answer: Well, it's definitely a mixed bag, isn't it? I mean, younger students, like myself, we practically grow up with smartphones and tablets, so we're naturally more comfortable with the latest apps and software. We're quicker to pick up new things, like video editing or using presentation tools. But then, some teachers are incredibly tech-savvy too! I've had teachers who are amazing at using interactive whiteboards and online learning platforms, and they're often better at explaining the more complex aspects of the technology. So I think it's less about age and more about individual skills and willingness to learn. It's not a simple yes or no answer, really.

Question 6: Do you believe that computers will ever replace human teachers?

Sample Answer: Hmm, that's a really interesting question. I don't think computers will ever *completely* replace human teachers, not in the foreseeable future anyway. While computers are amazing at delivering information and providing personalized learning experiences – like with those adaptive learning platforms – there's still so much that a human teacher brings to the table. Things like emotional intelligence, the ability to adapt to a student's individual learning style in real-time, and just the overall human connection and mentorship are crucial, especially for younger students. I think computers could become really valuable tools to *assist* teachers, taking over some of the more repetitive tasks, like grading or lesson planning, but the human element – the empathy, the inspiration, the ability to guide students through difficult times – that's irreplaceable, I think. So, no, not fully replace, but definitely become a significant support system.