Question 1: How often do you wear jewellery? [Why/Why not?]

Sample Answer: I don’t wear jewellery every day, but I do wear it on special occasions. For example, I might wear earrings or a necklace when going to a party or formal event. On normal days, I prefer to keep things simple. I think jewellery is nice, but I like comfort more.

Question 2: What type of jewellery do you like best? [Why/Why not?]

Sample Answer: Oh, I really love earrings. I think they're such a subtle way to add a bit of personality to an outfit, you know? I'm not really into big, flashy necklaces or anything too attention-grabbing. I prefer delicate, simple styles – maybe some small hoops or studs, sometimes with a little gemstone. I find that those kinds of earrings complement my style better and they're versatile enough to go with most things in my wardrobe. Plus, I've got my ears pierced in a few places so I can change them up depending on the occasion, which is nice. Big, heavy necklaces can just feel a bit cumbersome to me, and bracelets sometimes clash with my watch. Earings are just perfect for me.

Question 3: When do people like to give jewellery in your country [Why?]

Sample Answer: Well, in my country, jewellery is a really popular gift for a lot of different occasions. People often give jewellery as presents for weddings, of course, and it's very traditional to give gold jewellery, especially necklaces, to the bride. Then there are birthdays, especially significant ones like 21st or 50th birthdays – a nice piece of jewellery is considered a really thoughtful and lasting gift. Also, graduations are another big one; parents often give their children something like a bracelet or earrings to mark this achievement. I think the reason behind it is that jewellery is seen as something quite personal and valuable. It’s something that can be treasured and kept for a lifetime, unlike maybe a bouquet of flowers which will eventually die. It’s also a beautiful way to express love, appreciation, or celebration. And, you know, depending on the type of jewellery, it can be both a relatively inexpensive or a very extravagant gift, so it can work across different budget levels.

Question 4: Have you ever given jewellery to someone as a gift? [Why/Why not?]

Sample Answer: Oh yeah, loads of times! For birthdays mostly. I once got my mum a really nice pearl necklace for her 50th – she’d always admired that style. It was quite expensive, so I saved up for a few months to afford it, but seeing her face when she opened it made it all worthwhile. I’ve also given smaller things like earrings or bracelets to friends for Christmas or their birthdays, usually something that reflects their style or something we saw together and thought they’d like. I think choosing a gift that's personal and shows you know them well is important. It doesn't have to be expensive, it's the thought that counts, right?

Question 1: Describe an interesting TV programme you watched about a science topic.

Sample Answer: Oh, that's a good question. I actually watched a fascinating documentary on Netflix recently about the search for extraterrestrial life. It wasn't one of those overly sensationalized ones, but a really well-researched programme that looked at different approaches scientists are taking, from analysing radio signals to searching for biosignatures on exoplanets. What I found particularly engaging was the way they interviewed different scientists – astronomers, biologists, even some philosophers – and showed how diverse the perspectives are on this topic. They didn't shy away from the challenges, acknowledging how incredibly difficult it is to find definitive proof, but the sheer scale of the effort and the ingenuity of the methods used were really inspiring. There was this one segment on a telescope in Chile that's specifically designed to search for exoplanets, and seeing the images they were able to capture was just mind-blowing. It really made me think about the vastness of the universe and the potential for life beyond Earth, and it left me wanting to learn more about astrobiology afterwards.

Question 1: How interested are most people in your country in science?

Sample Answer: Well, it's a bit of a mixed bag, really. You definitely have your hardcore science enthusiasts – people who follow breakthroughs, read popular science magazines, that sort of thing. But I'd say the majority are more passively interested. They might watch a nature documentary or read an article about a new medical discovery, but it's not something that's a major part of their everyday lives. There's also a significant portion of the population that's just not very interested in science at all, unfortunately. I think a lot of it comes down to how science is presented in the media and in schools – sometimes it can seem quite inaccessible or overly complicated. So, overall, I’d say there’s a general awareness and a degree of interest, but it’s not a widespread passion.

Question 2: Why do you think children today might be better at science than their parents?

Sample Answer: Well, I think there are a few reasons for that. Kids today are exposed to so much more technology and information from a younger age. They grow up with interactive science apps, YouTube channels dedicated to science experiments, and even virtual reality experiences that bring scientific concepts to life. My parents, for example, learned science mostly from textbooks and maybe a few dusty demonstrations at school. Also, I think the emphasis on STEM subjects in schools is much stronger now. There's more funding, more engaging teaching methods, and maybe a better understanding of how to actually make science fun and relevant for kids. Finally, I think the overall culture is a bit more focused on science and technology. We see scientists as celebrities on TV, and there's a constant buzz about new discoveries and innovations. All of that makes science seem more accessible and exciting than it maybe did a generation ago.

Question 3: How do you suggest the public can learn more about scientific developments?

Sample Answer: Well, I think there are a few ways. More engaging science communication on social media, like TikTok or Instagram, could really help. Short, snappy videos explaining complex topics are much more accessible than long articles. Also, museums and science centres should be more interactive and less dusty! Hands-on exhibits and workshops would definitely attract more people, especially younger generations. And finally, I think schools need to focus less on rote learning and more on fostering curiosity. If kids are excited about science from a young age, they'll be more likely to stay engaged as they get older, and that will naturally lead to them seeking out more information.

Question 4: What do you think are the most important scientific discoveries in the last 100 years?

Sample Answer: Ooh, that's a tough one! There have been so many incredible breakthroughs. I guess if I had to pick a few, I'd say the discovery of penicillin has to be up there – it revolutionised medicine and saved countless lives. Then, the structure of DNA being unravelled was absolutely massive; it opened up whole new fields of genetic research and biotechnology. And I think the development of the internet and computers in general is also incredibly significant – it's changed the way we live, work, and communicate completely. It's hard to imagine life without those things now! Of course, there are tons more, like space exploration advancements, but those three spring to mind immediately as having the biggest impact on the world.

Question 5: Do you agree or disagree that there are no more major scientific discoveries left to make?

Sample Answer: Oh, definitely disagree! I think that's a really naive statement. We've only scratched the surface, you know? Think about things like space exploration – we're still discovering new planets and galaxies, and who knows what kind of scientific breakthroughs that could lead to. And then there's the human body – we're constantly learning more about genetics and diseases, and there are still so many mysteries surrounding consciousness and the brain. Plus, climate change alone presents a huge number of scientific challenges that need solving. I think there's an infinite amount we still don't know and major discoveries are probably happening as we speak, even if we don't hear about them immediately.

Question 6: Who should pay for scientific research - governments or private companies?

Sample Answer: That's a really interesting question! I think it's not a case of one or the other, ideally both governments and private companies should be involved, but in different ways. Governments should fund fundamental research – the kind of blue-sky thinking that might not have immediate commercial applications but could lead to huge breakthroughs in the long run. Think things like exploring space or researching cures for diseases. Private companies are better suited to applied research – taking existing knowledge and developing it into marketable products or services. They're driven by profit, which means they're more likely to focus on things with a clear return on investment. Of course, there's a lot of crossover, and collaboration between the two is essential. Government funding can help companies get started on risky projects, and successful companies can then reinvest profits back into further research, creating a virtuous cycle. But ultimately, a balance is crucial to ensure both innovation and societal benefit.